User Tools

Site Tools


eve:ship_modules:propulsion_mid_module:microwarpdrives

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
eve:ship_modules:propulsion_mid_module:microwarpdrives [2017/02/11 23:00]
conscript [Advantages vs. a Microwarpdrive]
eve:ship_modules:propulsion_mid_module:microwarpdrives [2017/02/11 23:00]
conscript [Drawbacks]
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 ---- ----
- 
-=====Drawbacks===== 
-  * Steady capacitor consumption as it cycles 
-  * Longer ship alignment speeds whilst it is active (though using for only 1 cycle will actually decrease alignment in all ships with natural or modified aligns greater than the cycle) 
-  * Afterburners don't provide anywhere near as much of a speed boost as a Microwarpdrive,​ roughly 100-125% boost rather than 500-625% depending on skills (some modules have a greater innate bonus) but come with less penalties. 
-  * They add mass to your ship. This is not really noticeable unless you try to fit a bigger afterburner than normal for your ship class, at which point your inertial increase will make your orbits very large (this is to prevent small ships from avoiding MWD penalities while still getting similar speed boosts from bigger drives combined with the tight orbits they normally enjoy) 
  
  
eve/ship_modules/propulsion_mid_module/microwarpdrives.txt · Last modified: 2017/02/11 23:01 by conscript